We are surrounded by gender role from the time we are very small. It is ever–present in
conversation, humor, and conflict, and it is called upon to explain everything from driving
styles to food preferences. Gender is embedded so thoroughly in our institutions, our
actions, our beliefs, and our desires, that it appears to us to be completely natural. The
world swarms with ideas about gender – and these ideas are so commonplace that we take
it for granted that they are true, accepting common adage as scientific fact. It is precisely
because gender seems natural, and beliefs about gender seem to be obvious truths, that we
need to step back and examine gender from a new perspective. This is not easy, for gender
is so central to our understanding of ourselves and of the world that it is difficult to pull
back and examine it from new perspectives. But it is precisely the fact that gender seems
self–evident that makes the study of gender interesting. It brings the challenge to uncover
the process of construction that creates what we have so long thought of as natural and
inexorable – to study gender not as given, but as an accomplishment; not simply as cause,
but as effect; and not just as individual, but as social. The results of failure to recognize
this challenge are manifest not only in the popular media, but in academic work on
language and gender as well. As a result, some gender scholarship does as much to reify
and support existing beliefs as to promote more reflective and informed thinking about
gender. Gender is not something we are born with, and not something we have, but
something we do and something we perform. Sex is a biological categorization based
primarily on reproductive potential, whereas gender is the social elaboration of biological
sex. Sex is based in a combination of anatomical, endocrinal and chromosomal features,
and the selection among these criteria for sex assignment is based very much on cultural
beliefs about what actually makes someone male or female.